Pilgrim High School
111 Pilgrim Parkway
Warwick, RI 02888 (401) 734-3250
INTRODUCTION
Pilgrim High School was founded in 1962. A member of the Warwick School District, it is a fairly large high school, with more than 1000 students attending. More stuff goes here. Generic stuff
COMMUNITY PORTRAIT
Warwick Community
Rhode Island
U.S.
Median Household Income
$60,980
$56,102
$53,046
Median Family Income
$76,695
$72,872
$64,585
Per Capita Income
$32,201
$30,005
$28,051
All Families Below Poverty Level
4.6%
9.2%
10.9%
All People Below Poverty Level
7.5%
13.2%
14.9%
Fig. 1
Income and Poverty
2008-2012
Census
Founded in 1642 by Samuel Gorton, Warwick is the second largest city in the state of Rhode Island, behind Providence. One of Warwick's most notable landmarks is the T. F. Green airport. The median household income in Warwick is $60,980, which is just higher than both the state and national averages. The median family income is $76,695, which again, is just higher than the state and national averages. These above-average statistics can help explain why there are less people below the poverty line in Warwick than in the rest of the state and the country.
Warwick Community
Rhode Island
U.S.
Population
Percentage
Population
Percentage
Population
Percentage
White
76,643
92.7%
856,869
81.4%
223,553,265
72.4%
Black/African American
1,387
1.7%
60,189
5.7%
38,929,319
12.6%
Asian
1,864
2.3%
30,457
2.9%
14,674,252
4.8%
Hispanic or Latino
2,827
3.4%
130,655
12.4%
50,477,594
16.3%
American Indian and Alaska Native
235
0.3%
6,058
0.6%
2,932,248
0.9%
Fig. 2
Race/Ethnicity
2010
Census
Like most of the state and nation, most of the population(92.7%) is white. More racial stuff here, maybe. Nothing much to say, really...Nothing stood out.
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
NECAP Assessment
State
Warwick District
Barrington
Central Falls
3rd Grade Math
56%
61%
79%
29%
3rd Grade Reading
69%
78%
89%
43%
4th Grade Math
63%
66%
78%
42%
4th Grade Reading
70%
79%
88%
44%
4th Grade Science
41%
41%
68%
21%
5th Grade Math
61%
66%
85%
37%
5th Grade Reading
74%
78%
92%
44%
5th Grade Writing
64%
71%
79%
36%
6th Grade Math
59%
66%
82%
26%
6th Grade Reading
72%
80%
89%
34%
7th Grade Math
59%
60%
87%
19%
7th Grade Reading
69%
69%
91%
32%
8th Grade Math
57%
61%
90%
15%
8th Grade Reading
74%
75%
94%
39%
8th Grade Writing
56%
55%
79%
13%
8th Grade Science
30%
21%
71%
8%
11th Grade Math
35%
33%
79%
12%
11th Grade Reading
81%
86%
97%
53%
11th Grade Writing
66%
71%
81%
35%
11th Grade Science
30%
20%
58%
8%
Fig. 8
NECAP Scores – Warwick District
InfoWorks
2013-2014 except Science scores, which is from 2012-2013
As far as testing goes, the Warwick school district falls right around the state average for most testing categories.
Fig. 11
Safe and Supportive Schools: Attendance
InfoWorks
2013-2014
State
Warwick District
Barrington
Central Falls
Percent Graduated
79.7%
77.1%
95.3%
73.7%
Percent Dropped Out
9.1%
10.4%
1.6%
15.0%
Percent Received GED
2.9%
4.6%
0.4%
1.9%
Percent Still in School
8.3%
7.9%
2.7%
9.4%
Fig. 12
Safe and Supportive Schools: Four-Year Graduation Rate (Students Entering Grade 9 in 2009-2010)
InfoWorks
2012-2013
State
Warwick District
Barrington
Central Falls
Percent Graduated Within 4 Years
77.3%
78.8%
93.7%
68.1%
Percent Graduated in 5 Years
3.6%
1.5%
2.3%
5.7%
Percent Graduated Within 5 Years
80.9%
80.3%
96.0%
73.8%
Fig. 13
Safe and Supportive Schools: Five-Year Graduation Rate (Students Entering Grade 9 in 2008-2009)
InfoWorks
2012-2013
State
Warwick District
Barrington
Central Falls
Number of Incidents (Elementary Schools)
2815
166
0
3
Number of Incidents (Middle School)
11537
440
32
358
Number of Incidents (High School)
17944
1129
103
117
Fig. 14
Safe and Supportive Schools: Incidents of Suspension
InfoWorks
2012-2013
State
Warwick District
Barrington
Central Falls
Stability Index (Elementary Schools)
87%
90%
97%
77%
Mobility Index (Elementary Schools)
14%
10%
3%
25%
Stability Index (Middle Schools)
90%
92%
97%
78%
Mobility Index (Middle Schools)
11%
8%
3%
25%
Stability Index (High Schools)
86%
88%
97%
75%
Mobility Index (High Schools)
15%
13%
3%
27%
Fig. 15
Safe and Supportive Schools: Student Indicators
InfoWorks
2013-2014
Total Per Pupil District
Total Per Pupil Statewide
Warwick District
$17,153
$15,370
Barrington District
$13,586
$15,370
Central Falls District
$18,910
$15,370
Fig. 16
Funding and Resources: Per Pupil Spending by Function Summary
InfoWorks
2011-2012
Author: (Shaun.) Editor: (Briana.) Total Score for this Evaluation: _/35 pts
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide each student with an opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a school, its district, and its community in order to better understand its strengths and challenges. Each report should describe their school based solely on evidence that they cite in their Reference section.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
Read author's report.
Carefully evaluate report by assigning a score for each criterion
provide constructive comments that will help the strengthen the author's report for each category.
Create a link to your evaluation at the end of the report.
RUBRIC
Name: Score:
Introduction:3/5 points 5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform. 4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform. 3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else. 2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community. 0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction:
Organization: 4/5 points 5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References. 4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence. 3: Report is missing one section. 2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each. 1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization:
Mechanics:4/5 points 5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report. There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax. 4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning. 3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning. 2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning. 0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions:
Creativity:3/5 5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report. 4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report. 3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity:
Conclusion:0/5 5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader. 4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community 3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings. 1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school. 0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion:
Data/Analysis:3/10 5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average). 4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures. 3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures. 2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures. 0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Comments on data/analysis/General comments:
Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
Author: Joshua McFarland
Editor: Kiah Marcotte
Total Score for this Evaluation: 28/35 pts
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide each student with an opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a school, its district, and its community in order to better understand its strengths and challenges. Each report should describe their school based solely on evidence that they cite in their Reference section.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
Read author's report.
Carefully evaluate report by assigning a score for each criterion
provide constructive comments that will help the strengthen the author's report for each category.
Create a link to your evaluation at the end of the report.
Introduction: 3/5 points
5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction: Just include the aspects that are going to be analyzed within the context statement and include who the report is intended to inform
Organization: 3/5 points
5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization: Don’t forget to add school data, other than that it’s all there!
Mechanics: 5/5 points
5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report. There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions: Good job!
Creativity: 3/5
5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity: Add some colors!
Conclusion: 4/5
5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be im0ortant to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion: Don’t forget your conclusion!
Data/Analysis: 10/10
5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Comments on data/analysis/General comments: Good job! But maybe add some analysis at the bottom of the charts?
Pilgrim High School
111 Pilgrim Parkway
Warwick, RI 02888
(401) 734-3250
INTRODUCTION
Pilgrim High School was founded in 1962. A member of the Warwick School District, it is a fairly large high school, with more than 1000 students attending. More stuff goes here. Generic stuff
COMMUNITY PORTRAIT
Income and Poverty
2008-2012
Census
Founded in 1642 by Samuel Gorton, Warwick is the second largest city in the state of Rhode Island, behind Providence. One of Warwick's most notable landmarks is the T. F. Green airport. The median household income in Warwick is $60,980, which is just higher than both the state and national averages. The median family income is $76,695, which again, is just higher than the state and national averages. These above-average statistics can help explain why there are less people below the poverty line in Warwick than in the rest of the state and the country.
Race/Ethnicity
2010
Census
Like most of the state and nation, most of the population(92.7%) is white. More racial stuff here, maybe. Nothing much to say, really...Nothing stood out.
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
NECAP Scores – Warwick District
InfoWorks
2013-2014 except Science scores, which is from 2012-2013
As far as testing goes, the Warwick school district falls right around the state average for most testing categories.
Links to the stuff:
Census
RI Kids Count
Pilgrim High School - InfoWorks
That PDF thing
Census-Based Indicators
RI KidsCount
2010, unless otherwise stated
Economic Well-Being
RI KidsCount
2013
Health
RI KidsCount
2013
*Data collected from 2008-2012
Safety
RI KidsCount
2013
Education
RI KidsCount
2013
Teaching Definitions
InfoWorks
2012-2013
Student Characteristics
InfoWorks
2013-2014
Safe and Supportive Schools: Attendance
InfoWorks
2013-2014
Safe and Supportive Schools: Four-Year Graduation Rate (Students Entering Grade 9 in 2009-2010)
InfoWorks
2012-2013
Safe and Supportive Schools: Five-Year Graduation Rate (Students Entering Grade 9 in 2008-2009)
InfoWorks
2012-2013
Safe and Supportive Schools: Incidents of Suspension
InfoWorks
2012-2013
Safe and Supportive Schools: Student Indicators
InfoWorks
2013-2014
Funding and Resources: Per Pupil Spending by Function Summary
InfoWorks
2011-2012
Author: (Shaun.)
Editor: (Briana.)
Total Score for this Evaluation: _/35 pts
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide each student with an opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a school, its district, and its community in order to better understand its strengths and challenges. Each report should describe their school based solely on evidence that they cite in their Reference section.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
RUBRIC
Name: Score:Introduction:3/5 points
5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction:
Organization: 4/5 points
5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization:
Mechanics:4/5 points
5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report.
There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions:
Creativity:3/5
5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity:
Conclusion:0/5
5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings.
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion:
Data/Analysis:3/10
5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Comments on data/analysis/General comments:
Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
Author: Joshua McFarland
Editor: Kiah Marcotte
Total Score for this Evaluation: 28/35 pts
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide each student with an opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a school, its district, and its community in order to better understand its strengths and challenges. Each report should describe their school based solely on evidence that they cite in their Reference section.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
Introduction: 3/5 points
5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction: Just include the aspects that are going to be analyzed within the context statement and include who the report is intended to inform
Organization: 3/5 points
5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization: Don’t forget to add school data, other than that it’s all there!
Mechanics: 5/5 points
5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report. There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions: Good job!
Creativity: 3/5
5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity: Add some colors!
Conclusion: 4/5
5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be im0ortant to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion: Don’t forget your conclusion!
Data/Analysis: 10/10
5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Comments on data/analysis/General comments: Good job! But maybe add some analysis at the bottom of the charts?